<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: PSoC4 Boot Sequence (Part 2) &#8211; Creating the Exception Table using the Linker	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://iotexpert.com/psoc4-boot-sequence-part-2-creating-the-exception-table-using-the-linker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://iotexpert.com/psoc4-boot-sequence-part-2-creating-the-exception-table-using-the-linker/</link>
	<description>Engineering for the Internet of Things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2017 14:29:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan Hawse		</title>
		<link>https://iotexpert.com/psoc4-boot-sequence-part-2-creating-the-exception-table-using-the-linker/#comment-2169</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Hawse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://iotexpert.com/?p=3034#comment-2169</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://iotexpert.com/psoc4-boot-sequence-part-2-creating-the-exception-table-using-the-linker/#comment-2140&quot;&gt;Carlos&lt;/a&gt;.

You are welcome.

The decision is by in large ad-hoc.  There are a few guys on the team in the US and Europe who keep track... Then when there is something compelling there is a joint decision by the CTO Office, the PSoC Creator Manager and the Business Unit Manager.  All that being said there has been extreme focus on PSoC6 the last year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://iotexpert.com/psoc4-boot-sequence-part-2-creating-the-exception-table-using-the-linker/#comment-2140">Carlos</a>.</p>
<p>You are welcome.</p>
<p>The decision is by in large ad-hoc.  There are a few guys on the team in the US and Europe who keep track&#8230; Then when there is something compelling there is a joint decision by the CTO Office, the PSoC Creator Manager and the Business Unit Manager.  All that being said there has been extreme focus on PSoC6 the last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Carlos		</title>
		<link>https://iotexpert.com/psoc4-boot-sequence-part-2-creating-the-exception-table-using-the-linker/#comment-2140</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carlos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 02:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://iotexpert.com/?p=3034#comment-2140</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this series of articles, is good to know this topic but i haven&#039;t seen a lot of post about this out there :).
Now a Off Topic question somewhat related to linker scripts: Some time ago i installed a newer ARM Toolchain (version 5.4), then set up Creator to use it instead of the toolchain installed with Creator (4.9) and had problems with the linker script (i can&#039;t even compile the project), with the newer version (6.3.1) i can compile the project but can&#039;t debug ;(.
How is decided what version of the ARM Toolchain ships with newer versions of PSoC Creator?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this series of articles, is good to know this topic but i haven&#8217;t seen a lot of post about this out there :).<br />
Now a Off Topic question somewhat related to linker scripts: Some time ago i installed a newer ARM Toolchain (version 5.4), then set up Creator to use it instead of the toolchain installed with Creator (4.9) and had problems with the linker script (i can&#8217;t even compile the project), with the newer version (6.3.1) i can compile the project but can&#8217;t debug ;(.<br />
How is decided what version of the ARM Toolchain ships with newer versions of PSoC Creator?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
