<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: PSoC FreeRTOS Binary Semaphore (Part 2)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://iotexpert.com/psoc-freertos-binary-semaphore-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://iotexpert.com/psoc-freertos-binary-semaphore-part-2/</link>
	<description>Engineering for the Internet of Things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2020 09:25:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan Hawse		</title>
		<link>https://iotexpert.com/psoc-freertos-binary-semaphore-part-2/#comment-74680</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Hawse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2020 09:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://iotexpert.com/?p=3699#comment-74680</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://iotexpert.com/psoc-freertos-binary-semaphore-part-2/#comment-73257&quot;&gt;Noriaki Tanaka&lt;/a&gt;.

You are correct.  In retrospect I am not in love with what I did here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://iotexpert.com/psoc-freertos-binary-semaphore-part-2/#comment-73257">Noriaki Tanaka</a>.</p>
<p>You are correct.  In retrospect I am not in love with what I did here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Noriaki Tanaka		</title>
		<link>https://iotexpert.com/psoc-freertos-binary-semaphore-part-2/#comment-73257</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noriaki Tanaka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2020 08:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://iotexpert.com/?p=3699#comment-73257</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In the uart_isr_Handler, the interrupt cause bits are cleared by the statement &quot;UART_ClearRxInterruptSource(cause);&quot;  but the &quot;NOT EMPTY&quot; mask bit is automatically recovered as &quot;1&quot; by a hardware.  In addition the interrupt mask bit which was cleared by the statement &quot;UART_SetRxInterruptMode(0);&quot; is also recovered as &quot;1&quot; anywhere.  So, the uart_isr_Handler is invoked twice for one character.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the uart_isr_Handler, the interrupt cause bits are cleared by the statement &#8220;UART_ClearRxInterruptSource(cause);&#8221;  but the &#8220;NOT EMPTY&#8221; mask bit is automatically recovered as &#8220;1&#8221; by a hardware.  In addition the interrupt mask bit which was cleared by the statement &#8220;UART_SetRxInterruptMode(0);&#8221; is also recovered as &#8220;1&#8221; anywhere.  So, the uart_isr_Handler is invoked twice for one character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
