Comments on: Implementing PSoC Printf Part Deux https://iotexpert.com/implementing-psoc-printf-part-deux/ Engineering for the Internet of Things Sun, 21 Jul 2019 17:39:52 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Alan Hawse https://iotexpert.com/implementing-psoc-printf-part-deux/#comment-13940 Sun, 21 Jul 2019 17:39:52 +0000 https://iotexpert.com/?p=3591#comment-13940 In reply to AgeMagister.

Yup… that works too…

]]> By: AgeMagister https://iotexpert.com/implementing-psoc-printf-part-deux/#comment-13855 Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:19:37 +0000 https://iotexpert.com/?p=3591#comment-13855 In reply to AgeMagister.

sorry, ‘x’-case i mean.

]]> By: AgeMagister https://iotexpert.com/implementing-psoc-printf-part-deux/#comment-13854 Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:17:02 +0000 https://iotexpert.com/?p=3591#comment-13854 “uint32 iVal, xVal”

it never used mutually. So xVal can be ommited, iVal used in ‘d’-case instead.

]]> By: AgeMagister https://iotexpert.com/implementing-psoc-printf-part-deux/#comment-13853 Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:11:27 +0000 https://iotexpert.com/?p=3591#comment-13853 Hello!
in code section “if(*pszFmt == ‘d’)”
there is no need to perform “change(buffer[i])”.

It can be placed more simple, just place (i+48).

]]>